Risk Advisory — Security · Data · AI

Risk priced in financial language.
Not fear.

Independent advisory at the intersection of cybersecurity, data governance, and AI strategy. No vendor relationships. No commercial stake in what we conclude.

Request a Conversation The Work
Scroll
Independence

Every source your board has access to is either a vendor, a consultancy with engagements to scope, or a journalist without operational experience. You are making governance decisions with no independent translation layer.

Materialiti exists to be that layer. Twenty years operating both sides of the enterprise value equation — protection and growth — in the same career, not sequentially as a pivot but simultaneously as a discipline. Security, data governance, and AI strategy as one discipline viewed from different altitudes.

The analysis reaches the conclusions it reaches regardless of who is in the room or what product is implicated. That is a structural feature, not a marketing claim. Verifiable by any buyer in under sixty seconds.

What sets this apart

Three things no other advisory practice can claim.

I
Convergence is the practice
Security, data governance, and AI strategy treated as one discipline. Most advisory practices are single-domain with adjacent claims. This one is built at the intersection and can demonstrate it through credential, client work, and published analysis.
II
Independence as structure
No vendor affiliations. No platform dependencies. No consulting firm parent with conflicting engagements. The advisory practice is structurally designed so that its conclusions cannot be purchased.
III
Risk in financial language
FUD is the commodity this market runs on. This practice prices risk, frames tradeoffs in the language of enterprise value, and connects security and data posture directly to valuation, exit readiness, and board accountability.
Who this is for

Three rooms. One practice.

PE & Board
Operating Partners & Board Members
Standard diligence processes are calibrated to satisfy transaction requirements, not reveal operational truth. Management teams have a structural incentive to present capability rather than expose gaps.
"What is the one question that surfaces what the management presentation is not saying?"
C-Suite
CEO · CFO · COO · General Counsel
No independent voice at the intersection of data, AI, and security simultaneously. Every source available is either a vendor, a consultancy with engagements to scope, or a journalist without operational experience.
"I need to be able to lead this conversation, not just attend it."
Practitioners
CDO · CAIO · CDAIO · CISO
Content produced for these roles is almost universally written by people who have studied them rather than occupied them. The operational, political, and career dimensions are treated as secondary to technical correctness.
"Written by someone who has actually done this. Not studied it."
Boundaries

This practice is not for everyone.

Knowing who this is not for is as important as knowing who it is for. If the engagement is expected to confirm what management already decided, this is the wrong practice for that buyer.

—Compliance checkbox work — SOC 2 readiness, audit prep, policy documentation as a standalone engagement
—Buyers who need a vendor recommendation engine — we evaluate governance architecture, not platforms
—Organizations that want validation rather than honest assessment
—Buyers whose primary criterion is cost per hour

The conversation starts with one question.

No pitch. No deck. A single conversation to determine whether there is a genuine fit. If there is not, we will say so.

Request a Conversation